Advertisements
Pro – Con – Neutral
1. Why would people be in favor of this?
2. Why would people be against it?
3. What would be a neutral position?
Look and Learn: 3,000 Arctic Reindeer Face a Mighty Water Crossing
1. Why would people be in favor of this?
2. Why would people be against it?
3. What would be a neutral position?
I think people would be in favour of this because there might actually be a bush fire on their island and the dears needed to be took off before it took over the whole island! Or the humans could of started to build a town on the island the dears were on and there wasn’t any room for the dears so the had to move them somewhere else! I think people could be against it because they could kill dears by letting them do things that the dears don’t to do! I think the best position for these dears is to just stay where they were because there might of not been any bush fires and city’s that were going to be built! I think taking risks are one of the most dangerous things to do because you never know what will happen!
People might be in favour of this because all of the food on the island they were on had ran out and they needed to get the across to another spot where there was more food for them to drink! I think people would be in favour of going across the river with the dears on boats because in the past so a couple of times before this one they didn’t go out to help them they would stay on shore but as they were out there by themselves they would turn around and come back because they would get tiered and weak! But when one turns back the man sad that the whole 3000 of them would turn back wit him! That’s why I think the people are now going out in boats! I think people would be against it because if they disturb migration the animals may turn back and destroy the pattern of the migration.
I think she would be in favour of this because she likes reindeers and wants reindeers to stop turning back from swimming.
I think people would be against her because the reindeers could die and think she’s not making a difference.
If I was in her position I would encourage the raindeers and be happy for them and I wouldn’t care about the negatives that people were saying about what I’m doing.
I think she likes the reindeers because they could mean something to her or she wants to make a difference to the reindeers migration. I would help the reindeers if I was in her position because I love reindeers and I want more together to cross the river to migrate and live happily.
I think people should let the rain dears turn back because there could be some thing chasing them.
Well people could be in favour of this because others don’t want 150 deers dying, so when she takes the deers to another island/ land and the deers would of survived because they swam. I think people would be against it because how cruel the lady was to the deers, but once you’ve watched the video you’ll understand why she had to do it and even though it would be painful to her as well for hurting animals. Also because how much the deers had to suffer from her. Well if I were the lady and I did something like that to any animal I’d think what I’d be doing is animal cruelty, because the lady snapped one of the deers antlers and they had to swim for over an hour in pretty much isolated water.
I think that some people will be in favour of this and some will be against. I think they will be for because if they love animals they won’t want them to turn around and die. They would also be in favour with this because they could go off track and get lost out in the ocean.
I think people will also be against this because it could be cruel to the animals and they could drown when the girl try’s to turn them around.
My opinion for this is that if it is done in the right way it is ok but it can also be cruel when she puls them.
I think people may be in favour of this because they are trying to help the deers and there may be no grass for them to graze in because it looked bare on the other side to eat. I think people are against this because she might be hurting the deer because of the way she turned they little deer around I. Th water. I think a neutral position for this topic is that it was good that they were taken to to the other side because there was barely any grass left on the other side.
I think that people would be in favour of it because she is letting 150 of them go in deep deep deep water and what if one day one of the deers got saw legs and wanted to go home she would not let them and they would sink, people would be against this because she does not let the deer go back and she breaks their antlers just to get them back and she makes them swim for an hour with no break it ridiculous because they could sink!,in my opinion this is very wrong because they will get tired and they will sink and they the babies will not get to live!
People should be fore this because she is helpng the deer survive So that the deer don’t die and she is helping the deer survive because she helping them get food because there is nothing on the other side. I think people would be against it because they don’t wont the deer swimming over the other side because they could drown because they have been swimming for an hour. So what I think of this is it is a great idea but they need a bridge or something so they don’t have to Swim that fare that but it is good that she cares about the Deers to keep them alive.
1 I think people would be in favour because If one of them panics they will all panic and head backhand if that happens the reindeer didn’t migrate they would die from starvation because there could be not enough for them all of them or none at all.
2 People could be against it because the reindeers have to swim an hour in just above freezing waters and baby reindeer had to swim for that long and they could end up collapsing from the cold or from being exhausted and if that happens the reindeer would be affected if one if them died or gets sick if the lady was there it would have a littler chance of happening.
3 My opinion is that it is a good idea to have a boat behind them because if they do panic the person can put them on the right track like the lady did in the video.
1. Why would people be in favour of this? I say that people do this, because they want animals to be able to live and not be extinct. I say this because, I if animals don’t do what they are meant to do it can effect the way the animal live, and the animal could die.
2. Why would people be against it? I believe that people would be against this, because people can get hurt or fall into the water. I say this because, if you fall into the water you could get kicked by the reindeer swimming, and low temperature can be a huge worry, because you can freeze to death.
3. What would be a neutral position? I think that what this lady in the video is doing, is the right thing. The reason I believe this is because, it’s keeping the animal alive, and letting be able to have food, and everything else it needs to survive in the Arctic.
I think people do this because there might be no food on the other side of the river and if there is no food they will start dieting and on the side they going to have lots of food for then and they won,t die. People might be against the lady because she is making them swim though a big river and people might just said let 150 swim back what’s the pomblem with it. I think it is a good that this lady is doing this for the deer and because if she just leave them there and all the deer will die
Especially the calves!
I think people be in favor of this because it would prevent them from dying on their own land because other things took over it or to teach them to swim! I think people would be against it because it is cruel and it is I unfair because animals should not be bossed by humans and they can drown! And would be a neutral position? Not!
I think the lady should be in favour so the reindeers don’t turn back if they do turn back they will die because they have no food.When the lady is not there one of the reindeers will go and then all the others will follow him.
I agree that they should go across the rever Because it is for there safety for food.
I think that it would be endangered for the animals and the people.
I think that it is a good idea because in the summer they have better food and water and warmth.
They would favor this because she dosen’t want 150 reindeers going back to that same land because there might not be any food anymore so she doesn’t want them to stave.
People might not want her to do that because maybe they don’t want them to get heart because they might be to cold so they turn back but the girl Doesn’t want that so she tries to turn them back around
But she might heart them .
I think she’s doing a good thing if she just leave them there they will stave So they will I’d any way
Why would people be in favour of this? I think the lady is doing with the raindeers so they can’t turn around and go back because there is no food for them to eat! Humans could build some towns on the land. Why would people be against It? -The could die if they have no food to eat and won’t have anything in there stearmet. What would be a neutral position? It looks like she could heat she hand or it looks like she is scared.